Al Smith vs. Vickie Raines choices Grays Harbor can live with


Are the political parties in Grays Harbor County becoming irrelevant? It isn’t even a question that would have been asked as recently as five years ago. Something is going on.

On the Democratic side there is perhaps the greatest rapidly changing landscape. With the recent election of not one, but two Republican County Commissioners in the last few years, the party has lost control of the traditional blue collar voters by jerking so far left.   I am sure that those at the Democrat central committee here in the county would disagree….but that is what happened.  Certainly a strong argument could be made that former Democratic PCO Herb Welch was a Democratic all along, never-the-less, he ran with an (R) after his name on the ballot. Defeating an entrenched card carrying left leaning Democratic in Al Carter. No easy task in what was effectively a one party county for the last 70 odd years.  The county Republican party just limps along as if going through the motions.  Its not their fault, Republicans are not activists, they just want to be left alone by nature.

Along came Wes Cormier. Wes makes no bones about it, he is a fiscal conservative. Considering the shock that Herb Welch had on the reeling Democratic party, it was an all out assault on him. Yet, he easily was elected to office.  Frank Gordon?  How do you get a read on this guy.  He is just as apt to chastise a Democrat from the Commissioner dias as he is a Republican.  He still votes for tax increases, but I suspect he doesn’t want to.  He just hasn’t found a way to stop himself…..I have hope for him and would be happy to participate in an intervention.  Those interested, contact me.

We are now moving into the third change to the county commissioners office with the election this November and will complete the critical alignment change. It didn’t surprise me to see Welch throw in the political towel. I personally doubt he would be able to find a conservative lawn in the county willing to host one of his yard signs. This left the field wide open, and it filled up quickly.

There are several on the ballot coming for the primary this August, but only the top two will move on to the general election. And those two will be Vickie Raines ( non partisan) and Al Smith (D). The few others are mostly single issue candidates who frankly I can’t even name as I write this, I haven’t seen them around and never met a one of them. Al and Vickie? I can’t buy gas or drive down the road without seeing one of them it seems. Both really want to win this thing.

I have a problem. I like both of them, and for different reasons. In my opinion my fellow citizens, we can’t lose on this one.

Now I know those of you in the Smith camp and those of you in the Raines camp will find issue with that statement, we are in the middle of what is going to be a hot county election. But as I have been brutally honest with both of your candidates, I am voting for who I think will do the best job. I am not basing on emotion. That has gotten me and the county in general in nothing but trouble for the last seventy years. The cycle has to stop.


10408884_778007188885804_8054117509730305363_nVickie Raines is a policy wonk. She has spent the last fifteen plus years learning everything there is to learn about government and public policy management. Most notably her work on the flood control issues.  She is tested.  It is common to try and get hold of her and she is driving to Olympia or anywhere else in the state for a policy meeting. She knows everyone and how the levers work, probably can fix a broken one. Smart as can be. Her problem is she has been around in county politics for fifteen years via her work with the city of Cosi and that is a long time. You make political enemies.  It goes with the political territory.  What is noteworthy is that she has survived in county politics for fifteen years.  Not easily achieved. No Party Preference, and one can point to her accomplishments.

If you talk to her political detractors they will gladly tell you why she would make a lousy county commissioner. It goes with the political territory. Vickie is fearless and not afraid to ruffle feathers. If anyone thinks she is a go along to get along politician, they haven’t met or studied the cyclone that is Vickie Raines. Expect a well oiled professional political campaign in the coming months.  CAMPAIGN PAGE


Al smithAl Smith is a completely different kind of candidate and has no name recognition among the average voter.  It’s two in the morning and raining. Your car won’t start and you are twenty miles out of town and need jumper cables. Al is the guy I would call. Oh sure, as he rumbles up in his old truck and robe and slippers he will curse and yell at you for not having your own jumper cables. “Do you know what time it is!!!!” kind of statements. Grumble, get you started, and drive home. But he WILL come. That is Al Smith.

Al, like Vickie,  has a strong business background and has approached policy issues here in Grays Harbor going back to the Satsop Nuclear towers mess. He is pro business and has become known recently with calling for safety measures to be placed on the coming oil trains. Before it became cool around here to call for it I might add. He is a small D democrat, more akin to your father’s Democratic party. You could just as easily call him a small R Republican. The designations mean nothing anymore. Al, like Vickie, knows everyone around here behind the scenes. He is the perfect “citizen” candidate. His detractors comment that he has no formal political experience. Having spent hours with Smith discussing area issues over the last few years, I can put that concern to rest. While he doesn’t have the formal government experience that Rains possesses, he has that common sense element and is no push over.  CAMPAIGN PAGE

Both candidates, in my opinion, are good choices and I don’t think we can go wrong with either. Raines running as a non-partisan candidate and Smith running as a small D Democrat. I believe the only people that will be disappointed will be the formal political party organizations here in the county. They have become irrelevant. Our Commissioners will no longer be “chosen” for us in a back room, but rather we now have the opportunity to choose them for ourselves.  We can’t lose.



NOTE ON COMMENTING: - as the political season is just starting,  I want to clearly state that comments are allowed on the postings, but please restrict them to policy.  Personal attacks against either candidate will not be let through.

10 thoughts on “Al Smith vs. Vickie Raines choices Grays Harbor can live with

  1. To get my vote, Vicki and Al have to step up to the plate on Oil, and a comment or two on Marijuana wouldn’t hurt. Or is Marijuana a City Council Issue? Al has already spoken on one. So far, he has my vote–his shirts and colors are blue and white. I have not seen Vicki’s shirts. Al brought his to our house–just dropped by kindness of his heart; but I don’t think he had any jumper cables with him. He also came to look at the railroad crossing and track behind our house. Before the third derailment of grain near Higgins Slough, which did block the driveway for over 2 hours–couldn’t get home.

    Feeling clairvoyant here, and being a lifelong non partisan, I see those two issues of Oil and Marijuana impacting the future of Grays Harbor. While they may seem disparate at first glance–they aren’t so much if you think about it? When I read the Sheriff’s blotter in the Vidette, I get scared. They said marijuana makes you crazy and I thought it was a medicine. I wonder what Al and Vicki think?

    Besides, I’m forced to name two issues, at the fear of being accused of a “one issue” campaigner. Oh–another question for Vicki and Al and all the other candidates: Which hospital do we go to if we live in Central Park, west of the Wynoochee?

    • Hi Carol,
      The voters have made a choice on the issue of Marijuana. Why it is coming up as discussion is one of the reasons why I am running. This country started from the bottom up. The bottom has voted and made a statement on the issue of marijuana. As an elected official I would consider the electorate as my employer and a payer of debts by this entity I am at the beck and call of the voters.

      On the issue of oil by rail it is all in my scoping comments letter to WestWay Imperium which I passed on to this blogs editor moments ago. My stance on that issue has not changed nor will it ever. We as Harborites who think very highly of this place have no room for the cartage or storage of this crude oil here. It is environmental suicide trip waiting to happen.

      Al Smith, Candidate
      G.H. County Commissioner
      District 3

  2. Yes Carol, I am with you on marijuana concerns, we have some time to flesh this issue…..might I suggest an editorial?

    NOTE: I have to make note that I made a mistake earlier when referring to Vickie as Independent, I corrected it. That term has changed in meaning over the recent years and is still stuck in my old school thinking. The new correct term and one that should be used when referring to Vickie is she is running “Non-partisan”. If I make the mistake again, which I probably will, just someone remind me.

  3. Well here’s one Independent who admits to being partisan in this race: Al is far and away a better candidate for the Harbor because he has a passion for its welfare.

    Tom, you may think choosing between slick and blue collar doesn’t mean much, but to me it means everything: the Corporate wings of both parties are cannibalizing our communities, while doing pretty well themselves. The Harbor can’t afford to go any farther down that road.

    And yes, I’m Al’s campaign Treasurer and proud of it!

    Claudia Woodward-Rice

    ED NOTE: Ouch, the first swing of the political season.

  4. I’m with Al also. He understands the oil issue and that is very important to me. Vickie trashed Frank Gordon for being against oil and now that she sees which way the wind blows, she’s against it too. But a major concern I have with Vickie is her support of the dam in the Upper Chehalis. For all kinds of reasons it’s a bad idea, two of which are that it won’t help Grays Harbor at all, and that it will negatively impact the fish and tribal treaty rights. It is not clear why she’s so gung-ho about it, but she is on the wrong side – of this and probably lots more.

  5. Linda, I am as ignorant on that dam as probably most people are. If you ever wish to pen something on that project and it’s affect on Grays Harbor I would be happy to print it. i attended a couple of those flood control meetings and left thanking God there were people looking into it. Way over my head and extremely complicated. Shore up a little rock bank here and two miles away ….this happens ….kind of thing.

    And the least little thing you do affects so many people all the way down the river. One could spend a lifetime engaged in flood control and I expect even then wouldn’t have all the answers.

    It is an extremely big picture issue that in my thought we don’t spend near enough time discussing in this harbor. The devastation potential from floods is as much a cause of worry as the oil trains themselves.

    • Hi,

      On the matter concerning a dam on the Chehalis. It is a no from this writer, due in large part its affect on the fishery. We as a human race have learned so much on the ramifications of dams. But there are sum who haven’t picked up on the clue.

      Yes they have served there purpose, however when most of them were built there was not enough study on the impact that such long term water retention facilities would have on the aqua culture.

      The Chehalis River system – one of the four largest river system on the West coast US is a primary resource of many fishery species to 21,000 families livlihoods. In a study conducted by our own Washington State Department of Fish And Wildlife it was determined way back then this was not acceptable due to the impact it would have on the various fishery culture.

      What this writer finds odd is that many millions of dollars was appropriated to study this issue again 43 years later.? It is my hope that somebody with more information on this subject has a good explanation for why this new study was implemented.

      Al Smith, Candidate
      GHC Commissioner
      District 3

Leave a Reply - Comments are held for moderation. Must include name or they are not put through.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s